top of page
Color logo - no background.png

Finance vs Lease: Which Ownership Model Makes Most Sense?

  • Writer: Andrew Knowles
    Andrew Knowles
  • Nov 12
  • 3 min read
Avoid costly mistakes when buying an aircraft.


The decision to finance or lease an aircraft is one of the most significant financial choices an operator or owner will make. The difference extends well beyond accounting treatment, it shapes flexibility, tax exposure, balance sheet impact, and long-term control of the asset.


In 2025, the private and commercial aviation markets have faced shifting interest rates, evolving regulatory frameworks, and an increasingly dynamic secondary market. Choosing the right structure therefore requires a clear understanding of both the numbers and the operational implications.


At Bespoke Aero, we help clients evaluate acquisition and financing structures objectively, balancing commercial logic with operational reality.


The Fundamentals: Finance vs Lease

Before comparing advantages, it’s worth defining the distinction:

  • Finance (Loan / Ownership): The buyer acquires the aircraft using a mix of equity and debt. Ownership and depreciation sit with the borrower.

  • Lease: The aircraft is provided under a contractual term. The lessor retains ownership, and the lessee pays for use over time, either with or without a purchase option.


Both routes can achieve similar end goals, but the difference lies in control, flexibility, and long-term cost visibility.


1. The Case for Financing: Control and Equity

When you finance an aircraft, you own it, and with ownership comes autonomy. You decide where it’s based, how it’s operated, and how it’s maintained. Depreciation remains yours to claim, and you benefit from asset appreciation (where applicable).


Advantages:

  • Full operational control

  • Ability to modify, refurbish, or charter at will

  • Potential tax benefits through depreciation

  • Clear residual value position


Considerations:

  • Requires significant upfront equity (often 15–30%)

  • Exposes you to residual market risk

  • May limit flexibility to exit early


For owners who value long-term asset control and predictability, financing remains the classic approach.


2. The Case for Leasing: Flexibility and Simplicity

Leasing is gaining popularity across private and utility aviation because it limits capital outlay and offers flexibility. It suits buyers wanting access to an aircraft without permanent ownership commitments.


Advantages:

  • Lower entry cost, minimal deposit

  • Defined term with predictable payments

  • Option to return, upgrade, or purchase at lease-end

  • Potential off-balance-sheet treatment (depending on jurisdiction and accounting standards)


Considerations:

  • Limited modification rights

  • Higher long-term total cost if renewed repeatedly

  • Potential return condition costs at end-of-lease


Leasing can make sense for fleet operators seeking flexibility, or private owners who anticipate changing mission needs within a few years.


Understand the pros and cons of aircraft finance versus leasing

3. The 2025 Market Context

In 2025, financing conditions are, and have been influenced by several converging factors:


  • Interest rate stabilisation: Following years of volatility, rates remain higher than pre-pandemic levels but are showing signs of normalisation.

  • Residual value uncertainty: Supply-chain challenges and OEM backlogs have inflated pre-owned values, but stabilisation may pressure residuals later in the cycle.

  • Emerging lessor appetite: New entrants in regional and turboprop leasing are expanding access to capital for aircraft types previously underserved by mainstream lenders.


These shifts make comparative analysis more important than ever.


4. Structuring for Success: Hybrid and Tailored Options

Increasingly, owners are blending models — for example:


  • Finance-to-Lease (Sale and Leaseback): Converts owned aircraft to leased assets to release capital.

  • Lease-to-Own: Provides use now, with purchase flexibility later.

  • Operating Lease with Maintenance Reserve: Simplifies management and improves transparency.


Independent advisors like Bespoke Aero model each option side by side, incorporating actual interest rates, lease factors, and tax assumptions to show true “apples-to-apples” comparisons.



Conclusion: Structure Follows Strategy

There is no universally “better” ownership model. Finance offers control and long-term value; leasing delivers agility and reduced exposure. The key is alignment, ensuring the structure serves your mission, not the other way around.


Bespoke Aero provides independent evaluation and scenario analysis to help clients make data-driven, defensible decisions. Whether purchasing, leasing, or refinancing, our focus remains the same: transparency, control, and value protection.



Contact our team today to arrange a discovery call, to evaluate what's right for you.

 
 
 

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
bottom of page